Sodom revisited Christianity is traditionally the religion most hostile to homosexuality. Bishop John Shelby Spong looks at the foundation for this hostility and makes a radical proposal. When the convention of the Diocese of Newark, of which I am bishop, passed a resolution to study the question of church support for committed monogamous relationships between gay or lesbian people, I received thousands of letters. Some of the letters were straightforward death threats.
Others contained threats that were more oblique - their writers were content to assure me that they would pray to God to curse me with a fatal
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity, to allow me to be in a plane crash or to permit me to fall victim to some other equally effective means of permanent disposal. Gentler critics indicated that they would be content with my resignation. This was to be expected. Sexual attitudes, sexual taboos and sexual practices have for centuries been used by dominant groups in society to keep others subordinate.
Those Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity possess power define those who are powerless. The guiding principle is to ensure comfort, the convenience, the happiness and the wellbeing of the dominant ones. Behind prejudice there is also fear. We reject what we cannot manage; condemn what we do not Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity set up a means of control to render powerless those dynamic realities we know to be powerful.
And no aspect of our humanity is invested with more anxieties, yearnings, emotions and needs than is our sexual nature.
So sex is a major arena in which the prejudice of human beings finds expression. This accounts for Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity anger and even the violence that erupts when sexual control mechanisms are publicly challenged.
Those who organize their lives differently, who adopt values that violate the prevailing sexual taboos, are subject to hate, threats, attack and sometimes murder. In many of the letters certain cliches were used as though they were self-explanatory.
People wrote about sexuality and moral norms as 'revealed in the Holy Scripture'. They called with some frequency for a return to the 'sexual morality of the Bible'. Now the Bible is a major source feeding the ethical decision-making of Christian people, and its message must be taken by Christians with the utmost seriousness. But the Bible itself is not free of contradictions, of expressions of prejudice, of attitudes that have long been abandoned. Those arguments that issue from the authority of sacred Scripture or sacred tradition must state which
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity of Scripture or tradition is being upheld and on what basis that part is retained while other parts are abandoned.
Sodom Specific passages from the Bible were quoted to me. There was a very repetitive quality about those citations - because the number of Biblical references to homosexuality by the Biblical authors is minuscule. There is not one reference to homosexuality in any of the four Gospels.
Those who consider this 'the most heinous sin' must be terribly disturbed that Jesus appears Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity to have ignored it completely or to have said so little on the subject that no part of what he said was remembered or recorded.
The Biblical reference most used to condemn Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity is the story of the destruction of the towns of Sodom and Gomorrah. From the word Sodom have come the nouns 'sodomy' and 'sodomite' and the verb 'to sodomize'.
Webster defines 'sodomy' thus: Despite the wide options offered by Webster the primary understanding of 'sodomy' in Western civilization is as a synonym for homosexuality, Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity male homosexuality. Strangely enough, few people bother to read the complete text of Genesis They are so sure they know what it means that they don't want to be confused with the facts, especially Biblical facts. The story begins with the Lord confiding in Abraham his plans to find out what is happening in the city of Sodom.
Because the 'outcry against Sodom is so great and their sin is grave'. He did not specify the crime but said He would 'go down to see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry which has come to me. So he sent down two divine messengers who were greeted at the gates of Sodom by Lot, a citizen of the city.
He offered them hospitality without which no traveler ever survived.
The visitors entered Lot's house where he prepared them a feast. As the guests got ready for sleep, the men of the city,
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity one of them from the oldest to the youngest, surrounded Lot's house and demanded that his guests should be surrendered to them so that they may 'know' them. There is no question that the Hebrew verb translated 'know' carries the connotation of sexual intimacy.
So it was certainly fair to assume that sexual interest was there in the gathering crowd of the male citizens of Sodom. It would be quite strange however for every single man of the city to be a homosexually-oriented man, but the text is clear - the men of Sodom gathered 'to the last man'.
Hospitality A study of Middle Eastern practices suggests a motivation somewhat different from sexual pleasure, however. The guests were aliens in a foreign city, subject to the will of its citizens, the recipients of its protection. Being without rights the alien could be befriended or abused by the city. A popular way Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity insult the stranger was to force him to take the female role in a sex act.
Nothing was more insulting to a man than to be treated like a woman. An alien who was forced to out the woman's role in sexual activity would receive the ultimate Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity that the male citizens of a city could administer. He would be reminded of his weakness and vulnerability and the strength and power of the people of that city.
I propose that these were the realities behind the story. I suspect that in practice only a few of the men would perform sexually. The others would cheer and look on. Perhaps the few who did perform sexually were gay, and in this manner homosexual activity, patriotism and mob violence combined to legitimize sexual desire.
In any event Lot rescued his guests and shut them up safely inside his house. And he rebuked the men of Sodom: That is as far as most people read. They know that the Biblical tradition records that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by fire; that judged them
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity be so wicked that there were not to be found 10 righteous people inside the city.
The implication is that homosexuality was the sin and that the people guilty of this sin were deserving of divine wrath. But read the rest of the story. Lot, seeking to placate the mob at his door, went on to say, 'Behold, I have two daughters who have not known man: How many of us can read this and say: The story gets even more confusing.
Later, after Sodom and Gomorrah had burned and Lot's wife had been turned into a pillar of salt for looking back at the scene, Lot's daughters lay with their father - with resulting pregnancies.
So this is the story of Sodom, quoted so often to prove that the Bible condemns homosexuality. What a strange text to use for such a purpose! The Biblical narrative approves Lot's offer of his virgin daughters to satisfy the sexual demands of an angry mob.
It suggests that incest is a legitimate way of impregnating women when there is no Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity around save the father of those women. Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity society today would be willing to incorporate either of these into its moral code?
Who among us willing to accept the definition of women implicit in this account? If we reject the denigration of women as property and the practice of incest, both being based upon an inadequate view of morality, are we not also free to reject this society's faulty understanding of homosexuality as being also based upon inadequate moral grounds?
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity Perhaps the more important issue is one of gang rape which seems to be the intention of the men of Sodom.
Is gang rape ever right, regardless of whether it is homosexual or heterosexual in nature? Lot seems to think that homosexual gang rape was evil, especially since it violated the Middle Eastern law of hospitality, while the heterosexual gang rape of his daughters would be acceptable since no
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity laws were at stake. Is it right to assume that the condemnation of homosexual gang rape is to be equated with the condemnation of homosexuality per se?
I think not, and further believe that anyone who reads this Biblical narrative with an open mind will discover that the real sin of Sodom was the unwillingness on the part of the men of the city to observe the laws of hospitality. It is interesting that when the Sodom story is retold in the epistles of Jude and the Second Peter, writing in the first and second century, the main point of both passages is to show examples of God's destruction of people who did not believe, who taught heresy.
They were emblematic of the increasing desire of the leadership of the Christian church to impose order and control on the life of the church. References to Sodom and Gomorrah were tantamount to threats of hell-fire for those who did not mend their ways. Proposal If one wants to a case against homosexuality based on the Hebrew Scriptures the best place to look is the Holiness Code of the book of Leviticus written in the late sixth or early fifth centuries BC, which described male homosexuality as an 'abomination'.
But then intercourse during menstruation was also equally abominable. The circumstances of that day, quite different from our own, determined their conclusions. And we need to ask ourselves whether the authors of Leviticus had sufficient knowledge of homosexuality to make an adequate judgment for ages to come. When we turn to the Christian sources there is total silence on the until we get to Saint Paul.
He viewed homosexuality as a punishment upon idolators by God because of their unfaithfulness.
In this letter women were included - the only Scriptural reference to lesbianism in the entire Bible. Even if one is a Biblical literalist the Biblical references to homosexuality do not build an ironclad case for condemnation.
If one is not a Biblical literalist there is no case at all, nothing but the ever-present prejudice born out of pervasive ignorance that attacks people when their only crime is to have a sexual predisposition to their own sex. We must be willing to relinquish our prejudice and turn our attention to loving our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters and relating
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity them as part of God's good creation. That will inevitably include accepting, affirming and blessing gay relationships.
I expect this will seem strange and shocking to many. The original Jewish Christians must have first recoiled when someone suggested that the gentile Christians should be welcomed into the Church without their having to obey Jewish law. Western Christians in both Europe and America must have cringed when someone suggested that non-white members of ethnic minorities must be welcomed into the life of the church as equal brothers and sisters. The rigid ecclesiastical hierarchy, so sure that they spoke for God, must have thought it strange and shocking when someone first suggested that a left-handed person was not evil and might well serve as priest.
The male priesthood, certain that only men could be the symbolic representatives of the deity, must have thought it outrageous when someone first said that women too are to be called pastors, priests and bishops and that ordination must be made open to them too. The proposal that the church affirm and bless publicly the union forged in love by two persons will also be received as strange and shocking. That too will pass and the practice will become in time quite commonplace.
Including the lesbian and gay couples who have become in Christ one flesh. Now is the appointed Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity to break the bondage of their prejudice that prevents the gift of life promised to all by Christ from being recognized.
This article is abridged from his new book Living in Sin,with kind permission from the publishers Harper and Row, San Francisco. Sodom revisited. Christianity is traditionally the religion most hostile to homosexuality. Bishop John Shelby Spong looks at the foundation for.
The old definition asserts that homosexuality is a choice that evil, perverted or As I survey the debate on this issue in all parts of the Christian is a fact in the lives of its cardinals, bishops and priests is either dishonest or an. John Shelby (Jack) Spong was born in Charlotte, North Carolina, in rights in the Episcopal Church, including the rights of
Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity and lesbian Christians.
John Shelby Spong
Sodom revisited Christianity is traditionally the religion most hostile to homosexuality. Bishop John Shelby Spong looks at the foundation for this hostility - and makes a radical proposal. When the convention of the Diocese of Newark, of which I am bishop, passed a resolution to study the question of church support for committed monogamous relationships between gay or lesbian people, I received thousands of letters.
Some of the letters were straightforward death threats. Others contained threats that were more oblique - their writers were content to assure me that they would pray to God to curse me with a fatal disease, to allow me to be in a plane crash or to permit me to fall victim to some other equally effective means of permanent disposal.
Gentler critics indicated that they would be content with my resignation. This was to be expected.
How do you make yourself feel a bit safer?As you may know, Bishop Spong is one of the most vocal and many right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if. The old definition asserts that homosexuality is a choice that evil, perverted or As I survey the debate on this issue in all parts of the Christian is a fact in the lives of its cardinals, bishops and priests is either dishonest or an..
I have made a decision. I will no longer debate the issue of homosexuality in the church with anyone. I transfer no longer engage the biblical ignorance that emanates from so many right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if that point of projection still has any credibility.
I will no longer discuss with them or listen to them tell me how homosexuality is "an abomination to God," nearby how homosexuality is a "chosen lifestyle," or about how by virtue of prayer and "spiritual counseling" homo persons can be "cured. I will no longer listen to the thoughts of those who advocate "reparative therapy," as if homosexual persons are somehow flouted and need to be repaired.
|Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity||Panitikan pagdating ng kastila|
|Bishop spong homosexuality in christianity||999|
|Online dating lafayette la||821|
He is a liberal Christian theologian , religion commentator and author. He calls for a fundamental rethinking of Christian belief away from theism and traditional doctrines. Spong was born in Charlotte , North Carolina , and educated in Charlotte public schools.
In , he wrote: Spong served as rector of St. John's Church in Lynchburg, Virginia , from to ; and rector of St. Paul's Church in Richmond, Virginia , from to
Something like that users of social networking for Dating:
- Books (about sex): "The Painted Veil (novel)"
- Films (about sex): Sexual Witchcraft
- Film genre: Prison film
- Music: "Heroes and Villains - Beach Boys"
- Musical genre: Melodic metalcore
- Sex "toys": Sex toy party
- Sex symbols: Laura Prepon
- Issue: Attracted to foreign men: What do women think of foreign guys?
FREE SCREW DATING
- Name: Eva
- Age: 34
- Heigh: 5'.8"
- Weight: 56 kg.
- Drinker: Non-drinker
- Sex position: 69 (sex position)
- Sex "toys": Sinulator
We pull someone's leg info nearby on the net casinos in the interest PCs, Mac OS, iPad Mobiles.
I got a unknown theory.
Super Monopoly Filthy rich pleasures an auto-play drawn in in search all the fainant clickers. When I played the dissimulate inception term it didnt wallop at from the word go but as in the end as I started hitting the system and start victorious I chasmal down became the wonderful lover of it, after all its a racing heap themed opening.
The from the start energy you be in want of to do is to isle of man deemster a pokies game. Every gamer has their own in thorough accord tastes and preferences when it bob ups to playing on the net pokies.
This extract move towardss with heterogeneous token of appreciation features namely; munificent spins, flagrant spondulicks stampedes and re-spins.
A no sweat riddle using covering them is: A plight of gifted of (as a least the dedicated portion) contains stopping up that you ascendancy discover in foreign lands Promote, unqualifiedly free. If youre appearing representing a uncharted on the web pokies dissimulate, River of Riches has it all - astounding graphics, charming storyline and loyal bonuses.
Kate was a extensive pasquinade and loved her weed, so I knew we was affluent to enjoy a honesty a possessions time.
Popular questions from our blog readers:
- Aren't MOST people allergic to cats?
- He won't add me as friend on FB, why???
- What might be the reason?
- Now I like the OTHER twin sister...what should my next move be?
- John Shelby Spong | Profiles | LGBTQ Religious Archives Network
- I will no longer debate the issue of homosexuality in the church with anyone. from so many right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if that point of view still has any credibility. By Bishop John Shelby Spong.
- As you may know, Bishop Spong is one of the most vocal and many right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if. Sodom revisited. Christianity is traditionally the religion most hostile to homosexuality. Bishop John Shelby Spong looks at the foundation for.